All posts by cattaplin

Unknown's avatar

About cattaplin

Researcher, writer, speaker

George Long in Coshocton and Jefferson Counties

Long, , , ,

So, after combing through all of the George Longs that just didn’t fit the parameters of the George I identified in Hancock County (i.e. age, wife, names of children, etc.) I found only one that could have been the man who moved to Hancock County and bought land there in 1848. There was a George Long who owned land in Coshocton County. Why did I look at Coshocton County? If you recall from several posts ago, George Long was supposedly from “Carroll County” (but it wasn’t a county at the time that he was supposed to have been there). So my searches had to take place in the five counties that Carroll was formed from: Stark, Columbiana, Jefferson, Harrison, and Tuscarawas. You may notice that Coshocton is one county to the southeast of that cluster. Why did I look at Coshocton? George’s son, George W. had Coshocton County listed as his birthplace his obituary. We can’t leave any clue unexamined, and thank goodness I didn’t ignore that seemingly one-off comment.

In 1833, George Long purchased 80 acres from William Cunningham in Coshocton County.1 George was listed on the Coshocton County tax lists from 1833 through 1848.2 Then, an 1847 deed recorded that George and his wife Isabella sold the land bought from Cunningham to Ranzel Butler.3

If you recall from the last post, George bought land in Hancock County in 1848.

There was a George Long who paid personal property tax (no real estate tax) in Jefferson County, Cross Creek Township from 1828 through 1831. He was enumerated in the 1830 census there as well, living near Dolly Long, Hugh McCullough, and Alexander McCullough, possible relatives.4 This George Long was not living in Jefferson or Carroll counties by 1840; he had moved on to Coshocton County.

Following tax and land records and comparing them to the censuses, and one clue from a son’s obituary, allowed me to track down George Long in two counties prior to his appearance in Hancock County.

We will discuss some correlation tools I used to keep track of this information and to present it to the judges in the next post or two.

  1. Coshocton County, Ohio, Recorder’s Office, Vol. 11 (1837–1838), p. 601, William Cunningham deed to George Long, 8 Feb 1833; FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C37X-CQF8-9), IGN 8578415. The land was described as the west half of the southwest quarter of S8, T6, R5 in the Military District.  ↩︎
  2. Coshocton County, Ohio, tax records for George Long; Coshocton County Auditor’s Office, Coshocton, Ohio. Records were searched and copied for the years listed; special thanks to Laurie Hermance-Moore MLS, AG® for visiting the Auditor’s office for me. ↩︎
  3. Coshocton County, Ohio, Recorder’s Office, George and Isabella Long, deed to Ranzel Butler, 6 Sep 1847, Vol. 21 (1846–1847), pp. 634–635; FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSLX-LSLC-K), IGN 8194076. ↩︎
  4. 1830 U.S. census, Jefferson County, Ohio, population schedule, Cross Creek Twp., p. 176, George Long household; image, “1830 United States Federal Census,” Ancestry (https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/8058/images/4093942_00281).  ↩︎

Two Hancock County Georges

Long, ,

While trying to determine WHICH George Long was William’s father, I discovered two George Longs in Hancock County, Ohio, of similar ages.

George W. Long, Amanda Township

One George Long used the middle initial W. He lived in Amanda Township with his wife, Elizabeth. He obtained 160 acres on 20 April 1837 through a cash sale.1 That patent refers to him as of “Franklin County” which is several counties to the south and east of the original cluster of counties from which Carroll County was created. In 1830, one George Long lived in Franklin County, Ohio; there were only girls, presumably daughters, in his household.2 Examining the 1840 census, reveals still only one George Long in Franklin County.3 Comparing those two households show that it is likely the same family that shows up in Amanda Township in 1850 with probable wife Elizabeth, and daughters Susanna and Lydia.4 George W. Long died on 18 August 1880 and was buried in Salem Cemetery in Houcktown, Jackson Township, Hancock County. This George was reportedly born in Maryland in about 1794. George’s will was entered into probate on 31 August 1880. His children were listed as daughters Mary, Eliza, Mahala, Elizabeth, Susan, and Lydia; no sons were listed.5

George Long, Portage Township

George Long purchased 40 acres from William R. Alexander in Portage Township.6 In 1850, he was living there with his wife Isabella and four of his children: Susan, Alexander, Ellen, and John.7He owned the farm in Portage Township until George’s heirs sold it to Abraham Miller in 1857.8 George’s heirs were listed on the deed selling his farm to his neighbor Alexander Miller in 5 March 1857: Alexander Long and Elizabeth, his wife, Isabella Long, Ellen Long, Catharine Franks, and Susan Long.9 Missing from the list of heirs was son John (presumed deceased between 1850 and 1857) and William. William, however, sold his “undivided eighth” portion of the same land to Alexander Miller in a separate transaction on 3 April 1858.10 George died on 8 October 1855 and is buried next to “Isabel” in Thomas Cemetery, just down the road from his farm.11

Maps

This is a good reminder to look at maps when researching your ancestors. It is one thing to say that one George was in Amanda Township and one was in Portage Township. It is another thing to see it on a map.

From the Library of Congress. Portage is in the upper left, Amanda is in lower right.

This close up shows the section of Portage Township where George’s land, that was sold to Alexander Miller, and the Thomas Cemetery, are located.

Based on the land records and the family make-up (i.e. George in Amanda Township did not have any sons), we can determine that the George Long in Portage Township is the father of William Long.

Now, where did the Portage Township George come from? Ten more candidates were found in the right times and places to possibly be the correct George. We won’t belabor all of those that I eliminated, but we will put together the pieces of the correct George and look at how I processed the information and kept it manageable next time.

  1. George Long (Hancock County), state volume patent (1837), certificate no. 174, Bucyrus, Ohio, Land Office; image, “Land Patent Search,” Bureau of Land Management, General Records Office Records (https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=OH1020__.174&docClass=STA&sid=bbz1fuho.ven). Patent for land in the Northwest 1⁄4 of S33, T1S, R12, 160 acres. ↩︎
  2. 1830 U.S. Census, Franklin County, Ohio, population schedule, Madison Twp., p. 88, George Long household; image, “1830 United States Federal Census,” Ancestry (https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/8058/images/4093939_00192). ↩︎
  3. 1840 U.S. Census, Franklin County, Ohio, population schedule, Madison Twp., p. 19, George Long household; image, “1840 United States Federal Census,” Ancestry (https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/8057/images/4409549_00206). ↩︎
  4. 1850 U.S. Census, Hancock County, Ohio, population schedule, Amanda Twp., p. 469 (stamped), dwelling 124, family 124, Geo. Long household; image, “1850 United States Federal Census,” Ancestry  (https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/8054/images/4204481_00165). ↩︎
  5. Hancock County, Ohio, Probate Court, Record of Wills, Vol. 3 (1862–1884), p. 484–485, George Long’s Will, recorded 31 Aug 1880; image, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9M2-LP1), IGN 5430906. ↩︎
  6. Hancock County, Ohio, Recorder’s Office, Deeds, Vol. 7 (1848–1850), pp. 112, William R. Alexander, deed to George Long, 10 Feb 1848,; FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C37X-QCZZ), IGN 8578921.  ↩︎
  7. 1850 U.S. census, Hancock County, Ohio, population schedule, Portage Twp., sheet 45A, dwelling 74, family 74, George Long household; image, “1850 United States Federal Census,” Ancestry (https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/8054/images/4204481_00312). ↩︎
  8. Hancock County, Ohio, Recorder’s Office, Deeds, Vol. 7 (1848–1850), pp. 112, William R. Alexander, deed to George Long, 10 Feb 1848; FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C37X-QCZZ), IGN 8578921.  ↩︎
  9. Hancock Co., Ohio, Deeds, 13: 290–292. ↩︎
  10. Hancock County, Ohio, Recorder’s Office, Deeds, Vol. 14 (1858–1865), pp. 224, William and Sarah Long, deed to Abraham Miller, 3 Apr 1858; FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C37X-NVXQ), IGN 8578925. ↩︎
  11. “George Long (1789–1855),” tombstone photograph, Find a Grave (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/39549214/george_long), memorial 39549214, created by “Calling~All~Angels”; Thomas Cemetery, Portage Twp., Hancock County, Ohio; tombstone photograph uploaded by “Calling~All~Angels,” 17 Jul 2009.  ↩︎

Full Text Search Finds – More Misfiled Papers

FamilySearch Full-Text Search, Genealogy Tools, , , , ,

I’m working on an project adjacent to my George Long project. I want to identify his wife’s parents, or at least her father. Her name was Isabella McCullough. A will was located for a Hugh McCullough leaving things to his daughter Isabella Long. A slam dunk, right? Um no. These people are trying to take away my last remaining brain cells, I think. I have found TWO Isabella McCulloughs who married Long men, one to my George Long, and one to James Long. I am not sure if or how James Long is related to my Longs, but that is another story.

The main point of this post is to highlight the amazing perk from FamilySearch’s Full Text Search that I hadn’t anticipated, but makes total sense. We can find papers that have been misfiled! I posted about another couple of examples of this before, but just came across another one. In the midst of Hugh McCullough’s estate papers, are several papers that clearly belong to a different estate, that of John Abraham of Jefferson County, Ohio.

A few images later, we find the Estate of John Abraham.

If we were researching John Abraham, unless we examined every page of the microfilm, every file in the courthouse, every image on the digital film, we would have missed this! The images that belong in John Abraham’s file start at image 139 and end on image 145. The pages consist mostly of receipts and the inventory list of the estate sale. Documents I like to see for my ancestors.

FamilySearch just filmed the pages as they were contained in the folders, so this misfiling happened sometime before the filming. I couldn’t find a beginning placard on this digital set that might have clued me in to the year of filming. It doesn’t really matter. The point is, this happened (and still happens). Papers get misfiled all the time, and are then “lost” because they are not in the right folder. They have been “lost” to us researchers, but they are now findable again because of the Full Text Search. Amazing!

A Great Lakes Interlude

Genealogical Education, , , , ,

Before I continue on with the George Long discussion, I wanted to take a moment to share some details about something that is coming up. Registration is open for GRIP Genealogy Institute.

I have the great pleasure to coordinate a course on the Great Lakes, and I wanted to share some information about the course’s contents and why it is an important region for genealogical research. I grew up near Lake Erie and enjoyed learning about the history of the area when I was a kid (well, to be honest, I didn’t retain a lot, what child really does?) but I appreciate it more now as an adult learning about my ancestors and how the region affected them and their livelihoods.

The lakes served as a vital transportation route that contributed to the westward expansion of the U.S. and Canada. If you had ancestors that lived around the lakes, they were likely impacted by the lakes’ usefulness in some way. Shipping routes and advancements in shipping technology, both for resources and people, contributed to the growth of the region. The fluidity of the border between the U.S. and Canada allowed border-dwellers to cross often for commerce, trade, occupations, shopping, attending church, and so on. Border crossing requirements were not put into place until the mid-1890s. The course will walk attendees through not only the history of the area but also has a deep focus on records in terms of what is available and how to access them.

I have a fantastic team of women teaching in the course with me: Cyndi Ingle, Paula Stuart-Warren, and Judy Russell. We will join forces to bring this important area to life through the following topics:

The sessions, and a bit about each:

  • Early to 1850s Geography, History, and Migration – Cyndi Ingle, in which she starts the day off with the early Mesozoic Period and brings us into the 1850s.
  • 1850s to Modern Geography, History & Migration – Cari Taplin, in which I get the better deal and only have to cover about a century of history.
  • Cash, Bounty, Homestead, and Timber: Land in the Great Lakes Region – Cari Taplin. I will discuss the ways in which settlers obtained land, the resources they discovered, and records for both the U.S. and Ontario.
  • Census Records in the Great Lakes Region – Cari Taplin. We all probably know all about census records, but this presentation will dig deeper into the censuses and census issues particular to this region, examining both countries’ records, and we will discuss some helpful methodologies for using censuses in this region.
1860 Racine, Wisconsin, Ward 1
  • Finding Birth, Marriage and Death Records in the Great Lakes Region – Cyndi will take a deep dive into vital records and alternative records for the times before vital registration was required. She will help students find challenging records for births, marriages, and deaths in both the U.S. and Ontario.
  • Crossing the Border Between the United States and Canada – Cyndi walks the class through the many records that are available regarding border crossings, including the St. Albans List.
  • Steamers, Tugs, and Schooners: Shipping and Commerce on the Great Lakes – Cari Taplin. This is quite possibly my favorite topic in the Great Lakes course. The Great Lakes waterways were instrumental in the growth of the region, for both Canada and the United States. In this class, we will examine the major shipping routes and ports, discuss passenger lists, shipwrecks, military defense, and transportation, and how that led to population growth. We will also talk about the major businesses that boomed with the expansion of shipping on the lakes.
  • Military Records on Both Sides of the Conflict – Cari Taplin. From the Revolutionary War to the War of 1812, and on to present day, we will discuss the Great Lakes region in terms of defensive strategies for military conflicts, but also about the records that exists for soldiers who moved to the area and left records.
  • Paupers, Pews & Planks: The Law of the Great Lakes – Judy Russell is as entertaining and educational as ever as she walks us through the laws in the Great Lakes region. She will discuss law issues from its origins in the Northwest Territory through individual territorial legislatures and on through statehood. The law of the Great Lakes Region has reflected the particular needs and concerns of its people and its economies. Most importantly, Judy will guide students to resources where they will be able to find the law applicable to genealogical questions at various times in the region’s history, with examples of how knowing the law can help explain records and solve genealogical problems.
  • On a Mission: Religion in the Great Lakes Region – Cari Taplin. Some of the earliest settlers and explorers in the Great Lakes were missionaries of various faiths, looking to convert the native tribes and indigenous peoples living in the area. This class will focus on major religions in the Great Lakes region, a history and timeline of their arrival and expansion in specific areas, and will include a discussion on the main denominational repositories for research.
  • Tracing French Canadian Ancestors – Paula Stuart-Warren will cover the important topic of the French Canadians in the Great Lakes region. If you have an ancestor from a Great Lakes state or province, it’s likely you have found a French Canadian connection. Your German or British Isles ancestor or their sibling may have married into a French Canadian family. Whichever is the case, the records are amazing; the names of parents are generally found. Learn about the general history of the people, the fantastic records created, the books and online resources, the repositories, and meet some new cousins. 
  • Researching in Ontario – Paula Stuart-Warren. Ontario is the only Canadian province to border the Great Lakes. Paula will walk students through researching in this important province. She will talk about the major resources that are available to researchers with connections to Ontario.
  • Great Lakes Newspapers: Defy the Borders – Cari Taplin. We will discuss the importance of newspapers in the Great Lakes region and how the news did not pay attention to the borders. We will discuss the importance of newspapers in the daily lives of our Great Lakes ancestors, and what riches can be unearthed between the sheets of newsprint. The availability of U.S and Canadian newspapers in the Great Lakes Region repositories will be shared.
Duluth Herald, 29 July 1918, p 2.
  • Naturalization and Citizenship in the U.S. & Canada – Paula will share information about migration between Canada and the United States, and as it progressed, new residents may have become citizens. This process was important to immigrants in order to assimilate into their new home, obtain land, vote, and take part in other government programs. This class will discuss important aspects of the naturalization process focusing on the Great Lakes region. First papers, declarations, final papers, passports, and other records useful for tracking down immigrant ancestors will be examined and methods for locating those records will be discussed.
  • Beyond Shipping: Making a Living in the Great Lakes Region – Cyndi will discuss the unique occupations in the Great Lakes region. Occupations went far beyond shipping and fishing. Farming, trapping, mining, timber, and railroads drew our ancestors to live and work in this area too. She will discuss the history of various industries that helped grow the area.
  • Major Archives and Libraries in the Great Lakes Region and their Fantastic Records – Cyndi will focus solely on repositories in this session. The research repositories in the area offer extensive in-house and online material for family historians. We’ll cover some at local, provincial, state, and country level. Overlooked treasures offer information that just might fill in those missing family details.
  • Mapping the Great Lakes using Google Earth – Cyndi will dazzle and amaze us with the capabilities of Google Earth and demonstrate how to create migration maps, plot out land owned by our ancestors, and make historical map overlays to show the changes in the Great Lakes region over time.
  • Bringing it all together: Two Case Studies – Captain Stephen Meeker, Sailor on the Great Lakes, and Those Loyalist Taplins – Cari A. Taplin. I finish out the week by sharing two Great Lakes families I continue to research. First, we will examine sailor, Captain Stephen Meeker, descendant of sailors and shipbuilders, who successfully brought the Percival Roberts through a storm. Second, follow the migration of the Taplin family around the Great Lakes as they arrived in the U.S., moved to Canada to avoid the Revolutionary War and ended up in Minnesota and Wisconsin around the time of the Civil War.

We do hope you will join us for a week full of fun and genealogy!

Visit this website for more information and to register: https://grip.ngsgenealogy.org

Known Information about William Long

Certification, , ,

Since we work from the known to the unknown, I had already researched the Long family line from myself back to William Long. In William’s records, he overwhelmingly reports that he was born in Ireland in about 1819. (If George Long arrived in Ohio in 1817, then William was born in Ohio, or George did not arrive in 1817 but later, or, William arrived later as a young child and was born in Ireland, but then George would have been married in Ireland, not Ohio… You see how this goes?)

Anyhoo, William married Sarah Metzger on 15 April 1841 in Stark County, Ohio. In 1850, William and his family lived in Allen Township, Hancock County, where he worked as a wagon maker. By 1860, William was farming in Findlay Township to the south of Allen Township. William was killed at Stout’s gristmill at Gilboa, Putnam County, on 13 August 1861, when his clothing got caught up in the belts, and he was dragged into the machinery; his body was horribly mangled.

Knowing the information about William pins him in a time and place. I then looked for George Long in Hancock County, as mentioned in J. W.’s biographical sketch, the family relocated to Hancock County. Two George Longs lived in Hancock County at the right time and were of similar ages.

  1. George W. Long lived in Amanda Township in Hancock County in 1840. A land patent refers to him as George Long “of Franklin County.” Franklin County is not one of the five counties that made up Carroll, and it is located in central Ohio, several counties to the south and west of the counties in question. George of Amanda Township was reportedly born in Maryland. He died on 18 August 1880 and was buried in Salem Cemetery in Houcktown, Jackson Township, Hancock County.
  2. George Long lived in Portage Township in Hancock County in 1850. He purchased 40 acres from William R. Alexander in Portage Township, Hancock County, in 1848. He died in Hancock County on 8 October 1855 and is buried next to his wife, “Isabel,” at Thomas Cemetery.
Map expanded to show the Carroll County cluster, Franklin County, and Hancock County.

So, two candidates in Hancock County exist. I need to determine which one is the father of William before I can then identify which George of the twelve is the correct George. The answer next time…

NEW! Study Group Based on Evidence Explained 4th Ed.

Genealogical Education, study groups, , , , , , , , , ,

We (Cyndi Ingle and I) have developed a five-week study group based on Elizabeth Shown Mills’s book Evidence Explained 4th Edition. This will be a nice companion to our study group based on Tom Jones’s book Mastering Genealogical Documentation. While it is not a requirement to have taken the MGD study group first, we will discuss some of the similarities and differences in their approach to documenting your genealogical research.

Image of the book Evidence Explained 4th Edition by Elizabeth Shown Mills.

Basically, outside of some standard conventions, there are also a lot of options when it comes to creating your citations. Mills’s book offers some differing options, provides ample explanation of the “why” behind her suggestions, and provides us with this fantastic tome to help everyone through their citation anxiety.

The five-week group will cover the first three chapters of the book. We will have a reading assignment along with guided homework questions to be completed before the discussion sessions. We will have a private Facebook group for discussion between sessions. Each session will be about an hour. You must own a copy of the book which can be purchased at Genealogical Publishing Company or on Amazon.

The cost for the 5-week course is $75. Click the links below to register. Please pay attention to the days, dates, and times when making your selection since they vary.

There will be three sessions (limited to 25 students):

If you can’t make it this time around, sign up on our Waitlist to be notified of the next session when it is scheduled.

We hope you will joint us as we continue to try to demystify the practice of creating citations for your genealogical research.

Identifying 12 Candidates

Certification, , , , , ,

In my recertification project, I examined census, tax, land, and probate records and identified twelve candidates in the right time and place to be George Long, father of William Long. But how did I decide on those twelve?

  1. Census – The biographical sketch of J. W. Long mentioned in the last post stated that William’s father was George Long and he arrived in Ohio in 1817 from “North of Ireland” to Carroll County, Ohio, where he married and had several children. I used that information to look for George Longs in the 1820 and 1830 censuses in the counties that would later make up Carroll County. They also had to have been born in Ireland, and of an approximate age to fit the other criteria such as the approximate age of William. His age was the one I left most wide open in terms of filtering results.
  2. Land – Knowing that many immigrants came to the United States for land opportunities, I identified George Longs in the Bureau of Land Management’s General Land Office (BLM GLO) database as well as in deed books in the five counties.
  3. Tax – Many counties in Ohio have tax records digitized and online for the years in which I was expecting to find George Long. Tax records can act like a yearly census.
  4. Marriage – Also, many counties in Ohio have marriage records available online for the counties in question in the right time frame to match the information from the biographical sketch. If the correct George Long married in one of the counties that made up Carroll County, then I should find a marriage record, ideally. (I never did.) But the marriage records let me sort out the other Georges into separate individuals.

Basically, I collected every George Long I could find in these records, matched them up as the same man, if I could with other context clues (land descriptions mostly), and boiled it down to twelve candidates. How did I keep track of everyone? Besides just textual notes in Scrivener where they were linked to their records, I also used a mind map which I created in Scapple. I am not traditionally a mind-mapper, it’s just not how I think, but it worked beautifully for this project.

A very zoomed out view of my mind map. You’re not necessarily supposed to understand my thoughts, but this is how I organized those candidates and narrowed it down to twelve separate men.

Mind mapping can be used to organize your thoughts. I’ve been to lectures and webinars on the topic. Many times they are used to help with writing in which you can just dump your thoughts into a mind map in no particular order and then later drag the pieces around to become more organized. I personally generally do better with outlines. However, as you can see, I had a lot of little bits of information I was trying to match up to individuals of the same name.

As I am looking at this mind map now, months after its use was finished, I don’t recall the point of the different colors. I believe the red/pink was definitely the wrong man but the blue and yellow I can’t remember why I used them. I’m sure I had a great reason at the time. They all ended up being the wrong man except for the green one and his connected records. And once I got to a certain point of understanding who was who, I stopped using the mind map and started writing. So, it is unfinished as a work product on its own.

Some of the boxes have questions, thoughts, reasoning, and information items. This was very useful when having to set the project aside to say, make dinner, and work, and then come back to it several days later. This allowed me to recall my thinking about a particular man and why I thought he was the wrong one.

Different tools fit different situations and different brains. You might absolutely love mind mapping and use it a lot more than I do. Someone else may prefer to have done all of this in a spreadsheet. Honestly, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that it works for you.

Recertification: What is it? And What Did I Do?

Certification, , , , , , ,

Once you pass your first portfolio with the Board for Certification of Genealogists, you have to submit a project every five years that shows you are not only keeping up with your skills but also improving on any shortfalls they noted in your last portfolio. This time only one project is required at minimum, but it must meet the Genealogical Proof Standard.

My recertification project this time was to identify the father of William Long, my third great grandfather. I had one starting piece of information about William’s father. His William’s son, J. W. Long’s biographical sketch in the Wood County, Ohio, county history. The sketch claims that his grandfather, George Long, came from “North of Ireland” to Carroll County, Ohio, in 1817, married there, and then had several children named in the sketch: George, William, John, Catherine, Ellen, Susan, and Alexander. It does not name his grandmother, George’s wife.

There are some problems with this statement, which I will breakdown over the course of this series. As I was researching this family, several things became clear to me. The first thing was that Carroll County did not exist in 1817. It was not formed until 1833 when it originated from land taken from five counties: Columbiana, Harrison, Jefferson, Stark, and Tuscarawas.1 When George Long arrived in “Carroll County” in 1817, it must have still been one of these other original counties.

This meant that I had to widen my search from one county to five or six, depending on the time frame.

If George arrived in Ohio in 1817, then surely he was enumerated in the 1820 census. Of the nine George Longs in Ohio in 1820, only two lived in one of the target counties: George Long in Salem Township, Columbiana County, and George Long in Brown Township, Stark County. A similar search in the 1830 census shows there were 22 households in Ohio headed by a man named George Long (or similar), four of whom were in a target county. Depending on what record sets I looked at, I found MANY George Longs in and about the correct area in 1820 to 1840.

I identified twelve (12!) candidates that could have fathered William Long. The main purpose of my project was to examine these twelve candidates and eliminate them until only one man made sense. Some were easy to eliminate, others were trickier. I will share some of my information organization tricks in the next post.

1. Acts of A General Nature Passed at the First Session of the Thirty First General Assembly of the State of Ohio (Columbus: State of Ohio, 1832), p. 8; image, Google Books (https://books.google.com/).↩

I’m Recertified!

Certification, , , ,

I’ve written in the past a little bit about a project I was working on involving George Long, my 4x great grandfather. It was for my recertification project for the Board for Certification of Genealogists. Once you pass your first portfolio, you have to submit a project every five years that shows you are not only keeping up with your skills but also improving on any shortfalls they noted in your last portfolio.

I finished the project in mid-December and shipped it off before the holidays because I did not want to worry about it while trying to relax and enjoy family time. I was told the wait could be up to six months, so imagine my surprise when I got the email informing my my project passed and I am certified for another five years!

Well, when the news came I was sick in be with the worst “stomach flu” I may have ever experienced. We assume it was Norovirus based on the symptoms. My son, who works in hospitals and medical clinics, got it first, and likely brought it home. We immediately started wiping everything down and doing laundry and trying to help him feel better. But I did not escape. I was sick next, and it put me in bed for four solid days, and I honestly didn’t feel like 100% until Sunday, so a full seven days to recover. I got the recertification news on Tuesday (day 3) of being sick. I checked my emails and gave out a very puny “yay.” My husband got a very minor version of whatever our son and I had. Thank goodness, because we needed someone to go get Gatorade and ginger ale and applesauce and otherwise hold down the fort.

I then spent the next week trying to catch up on work. So I’m only now taking a moment to share the news. Over the next few blog posts, I’m going to share some of the problems I solved within that larger project, some of the techniques I used to stay organized, and anything else that jumps out at me about it.

I do want to share this. The anticipation, the worry, the anxiety, and the imposter syndrome I think we all experience (in any field), is real. I definitely worried that some major flaw in my reasoning would be found, that they’d realize they never should have passed me in the first place. Yet, at the same time, I felt more confident on this one than I did on the last recertification. The confidence did nothing to alleviate the anxiety, but, looking back, I think that is a sign of increased skill, knowledge, familiarity with material, and having a good support system, not just with my family but my colleagues as well. It took me one portfolio and two renewals to think, “maybe I DO know what I’m doing.” Ha! If you know me or have been a participant in any of my study groups or courses, I’m sure you’re thinking I’m ridiculous. If you are a certified or accredited colleague of mine, you likely know what I’m talking about. Overall, my point is, don’t let the anxiety hold you back. Do your best and learn from it.

Why You Should Consisder an MGP study group

Genealogical Education, , ,

If you are a burgeoning genealogist, you might consider taking our study group based on the book Mastering Genealogical Proof (MGP) by Tom Jones. And if you are an established genealogist, you might consider a refresher on the topic. MGP covers the five elements of the Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS):

  1. Reasonably exhaustive research
  2. Full and complete citations
  3. Analysis and correlation of evidence
  4. Resolution of conflicts
  5. A written conclusion

The MGP book by Tom Jones was designed as a study guide with questions at the end of each chapter. This has been a fantastic way to study the topics of the GPS. He has them broken down into tangible parts, with examples from his own work. The GPS allows genealogists to be confident in their findings, especially as it pertains to tough problems. This book breaks all of that down into easy-to-understand concepts.

Our study groups work through his book, studying his examples, but we also add our own examples to those in the book. We have time for discussion of the book’s questions and of anything from it that is confusing or unclear, and we share our own experiences with those topics.

This year, we are only doing one session of MGP (to make way in our class schedule for a new exciting opportunity; stay tuned). This session will be led by Cyndi Ingle (of Cyndi’s List) and starts on 15 February 2025 and runs on Saturdays at 5pm Eastern for seven weeks.

Please visit this link for the full details.

To register, click here.

We hope you will join us! This opportunity won’t be available again until 2026!